The Loch Ness Monster: Contemporary History

The Loch Ness Monster: Contemporary History

Credit: Yulia Bogomolova / Shutterstock

Loch Ness monster sightings continue to be reported. IN last report, accompanied by video, is a 20-30-foot-long creature that occasionally breaks the surface of the water. Although the video clearly shows a moving V-shaped awakening, it does not reveal the main source. The witnesses definitely saw something, but what?

There are over 85 theories about what The Loch Ness Monster is, starting with the prosaic (wind spotsreflections, plant residues and waking a boat) to the zoological improbability (anacondas, killer whales and the ocean sunfish) to the downright insane (ghost dinosaurs). The people who invented these theories are not necessarily familiar with the lake.

Many early suggestions from foreign zoologists suggested that they considered the lake to be salt water, which explains suggestions for sunfish, whales, sharks and rays. Some theories have been rediscovered independently, showing the ingenuity of each generation of Nessie inventors. For example, the idea that the Loch Ness monster was originally a floating elephant from a visiting circus, restored three times, in 1934, 1979 and 2005. Each time the man claimed that the idea was original.

The reptile Nessie

However, the idea of ​​the Loch Ness monster as a prehistoric reptile really captured the imagination of the public in the 1930s. Nessie’s modern genesis did begin in April 1933. The first eyewitness accounts of a strange animal in the lake began in 1930.

Yet it was not until August 1933 that Witness George Spicer, who saw Nessie on land, first suggested that the creature was a reptile. Until then, informed commentators suggested that if there was an animal in the lake, it was some wandering freshwater animal like a seal that had made its way from Moray Firth. Spicer has just described it as a prehistoric reptile. He claims to have a long neck which allowed a journalist five days later to suggest that it was a plesiosaur, a species of long-necked sea reptile from the Jurassic and Cretaceous periods. A (but not the only) popular image of the Loch Ness monster was born.

The fact that Nessie’s plesiosaur image originated in August 1933 casts doubt on Daniel Loxton and Donald Protero (2013) Nessie’s theory stems from the hugely popular 1933 King Kong film depicting a man-eating, long-necked reptile inhabiting a swamp. More likely King Kong only affected instead of creating the modern Nessie. The first sightings of the Loch Ness monster were in 1930, and although there were more sightings in 1933, they began in April, before King Kong was screened in Scotland.

It is complicated

Most reports of the Loch Ness monster do not show long necks. Biochemist (and Nessie researcher) Roy McAll said in 1976 that there were more than 10,000 reports of the Loch Ness monster, but gave no evidence to support that, and a table in his book The Loch Ness Monsters contains only 251 reports. I know about 1452 different meetings. Only about 20% of the reports mention a neck of any length, so this is not the normal shape of the monster. Also, less than 1% of the creatures in the reports are described as reptiles or scaly. So I think it’s reasonable to assume that whatever the reported phenomena of the Loch Ness monster are based on, it’s not based on flashes of prehistoric reptile.

In fact, the Loch Ness monster has many identities. It may not be a walrus, moose, camel or visiting aliens as well some have suggestedbut can be innumerable from anthropogenic (boats, tracks, debris) and natural (animals, plant mats) and physical phenomena (wind effects, reflections). The Loch Ness monster can vary in color from pink to black, it can be matte or glossy, hairy or scaly. He may have humps and manes, he may have horns and travel at high speed or he may not move at all. No identity captures the variety of Nessie’s reported characteristics.

This suggests that Nessie is a function of human psychology, not nature. And perhaps human psychology, not nature, supports the idea of ​​Nessie from the 1930s.

So what did the last witnesses see? The reality is that we have too little information to come to a definite conclusion about what is happening in the video. The problem with most Nessie reports is that they just don’t have the details you need to identify an animal. And all the reported details may be misinterpreted. The fact that the visible awakening is moving indicates that it was an actual animal (not captured vegetation). But did a 20-30-foot-tall animal or some water-loving bird or otter underwater create a big trail in smooth water? We’ll just never know.

Could the Loch Ness monster be a giant eel?

provided by
The conversation

This article was republished by The conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read on original article.The conversation

Quote: The Loch Ness Monster: Contemporary History (2022, May 13), retrieved on May 13, 2022 from

This document is subject to copyright. Except for any fair transaction for the purpose of private research or study, no part may be reproduced without written permission. The content is provided for informational purposes only.

Related Posts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.