The Kentucky Supreme Court recently ruled on a cell phone geo-tracking case. Police are using real-time cell phone geo-tracking information to find the alleged thief. Police then arrested him on the basis of information they managed to gather from the suspect’s mobile phone.
Police and advertisers use geo-tracking all the time. The FBI used geo-tracking before and after Jan. 6 to identify Trump supporters who were in or near the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6.
But last week, Bill Bar scoffed at the idea and laughed out loud at the technology used in the 2000 Mules to identify Democrat bulletin traffickers on the battlefield. Either Bar is ill-informed about the use of this technology, or he deliberately misled the fictitious commission of January 6.
Bar was filmed in a video saying: “The election was not stolen by fraud. And after the election, I didn’t see anything that would change my mind about that, including the movie “2000 Mules.”
NEW – Bill Bar: “Elections are not stolen by fraud. And after the election, I didn’t see anything that would change my mind about that, including the movie “2000 Mules.”pic.twitter.com/TDU7OgPpNP
– Disclose.tv (@disclosetv) June 13, 2022
Bar talks about the evidence from a cell phone. Apparently Bill Bar was not informed about the traffickers. Most of the traffickers worked at night when the rest of the audience slept. As you would expect, it is much easier to track phones during the day when there is less street traffic.
Bill Bar either had no idea what he was talking about, or he was deliberately misleading the fictitious commission.
Conspiracy theory bar for 2,000 mules: “It’s just indefensible.” pic.twitter.com/vgvmNj5jdv
– Republican Reporting Project (@AccountableGOP) June 13, 2022
There is much more evidence of voter fraud from the upcoming elections in 2020
Patriot Joe Brandis, investigating Michigan voter fraud after the 2020 election with Michigan Citizens for Election Integrity and his team continues to discover more and more footage of bulletin traffickers discarding numerous ballots in Detroit’s ballot boxes on the eve of the 2020 election.
In a previous report, the executive director of wireless services destroyed ignorant attacks by fake fact-checking on the facts presented in 2000 Mules.
The Gateway Pundit talks to Volta Wireless founder David Sinclair.
Volta wireless connection provides software and services to stop network operators from tracking your location, identity, communications, Internet activity, and more.
Volta Wireless protects consumers from geo-tracking by government, wireless companies or technology giants.
Mr. Sinclair told TGP, “My business is focused on empowering people to stop allowing technology companies, mobile operators and, in addition, government agencies to use their mobile phones to monitor their every move.” By the end of this month, we will start shipping our own phone that will not use Google Android or Apple iOS based operating system. It will use our own Volt OS, so operating system vendors will no longer be able to use your mobile phone to track your activity.
As for the facts presented in “2000 Mules”, Sinclair said: “I watched the movie. I read the rebuttals published by AP and others. And unlike the media companies that published the rebuttals, I actually talked to Greg to get a better idea of the details of the data and the methodology they used. “
“Many of the verifying facts, clearly, have no technical basis for the comments they make. They made statements such as “experts say that the location data you receive from a mobile phone will be plus or minus 100 feet.” While this may have been true at some point, it is not true today at all. It comes down to being a few feet away … And these phones use GPS locations. They also use tower triangulation, “Sinclair added.
Triangulation is a technology that has been used for a long time to determine the location of something else. At one point you get something that keeps track of where something is, and you get something at another point to keep track of where that same thing is. And when you combine that information, you can figure out exactly where that thing is, within a few feet. It’s all a triangulation of the tower.
According to Sinclair, technology is constantly improving.
“The quality of antennas and telephones has improved dramatically over the last few years. We have many subscribers to our service who will have a phone every three or four years. And their signal quality is on the same level. And they buy a new phone and suddenly their signal quality improves dramatically because the antenna quality improves. And the same thing happens with cameras. The same thing happens with all the technologies built into mobile phones. And location tracking is just another part of this puzzle.
The government is using geo-tracking to track the hundreds of thousands of illegal migrants entering the country today. Once upon a time, when INS released people who were illegal immigrants, they put an ankle monitor on them so they could track their whereabouts. They have stopped doing that. Instead, they give them a cell phone. And they use this to track their location.
Now, what they’ve found is that many immigrants throw away their phones because they realize they’re being used to track their location. But the government itself recognizes the validity of using cell phone data to track people’s whereabouts.
From our discussion with David Sinclair, it is clear that AP and Politifact need better writers and better arguments. Once again, these false verifications impose completely inaccurate arguments to disprove a conservative position. And the mainstream media cover these shallow arguments. What a scam.
Here is the AP’s report on this week’s Kentucky Supreme Court ruling.
IN AP reported:
The Kentucky Supreme Court ruled on Thursday that police violated the constitutional protection of a robbery suspect by gaining access to his cell phone without a warrant, calling the use of the phone a “deeply invasive” tracking device.
In decision 4-3, a majority of the court said the robbery suspect was searched without a warrant when police received real-time information about the location of his mobile phone. They considered that the information had been obtained illegally and should be excluded from the evidence.
The question was whether there was a “reasonable expectation of confidentiality” regarding real-time location information on a person’s cellular site, also known as CSLI, under the Federal Amendments to the Fourth Amendment to unjustified searches and seizures. Such information can be used to determine the location of a mobile phone with “almost perfect accuracy” when the phone is turned on, the court noted.
“When a person receives a real-time CSLI on a cell phone, police seize a cell phone and its broadcasts to locate that person,” said Chief Justice John D. Minton Jr. said in writing for the majority. “We find this usurpation of a person’s private property to be deeply invasive and liken it to a technological violation.