Get ready for the sexual police after the horns!

Sex police in a post-Roe world

The main argument against abortion was summed up just six weeks ago by a Florida senator. Rick Scott on the pages of The Wall Street Journal when he boldly stated that “the Republican position on abortion is based on the basic belief that life begins at conception.” Let’s put aside what exactly conception means – is it the same as fertilization, for example? – such a claim implies that abortion, with the possible exception of those performed to save the life of a pregnant woman, is murder. Not just conservatives like Scott feel that way, of course. Some libertarians, including some of my colleagues here reason share this opinion and thus call abortion nothing less than “infanticide. “

The equation of abortion with murder may be unhistorical (more on that in a moment), but now that deer has been canceled, such a belief has profound consequences for people living in the 26 states, which are likely to ban most, if not all, abortions. If life really begins at conception, then the state has a positive obligation to protect all zygotes (fertilized eggs), blastocysts (weekly zygotes) and embryos (zygotes implanted in the uterine wall). From a libertarian point of view, the consequences of such a change are striking. This is a recipe not for a limited government, but for one that, in the name of protecting life, freedom and the pursuit of happiness, must monitor and follow all actions of potential reproduction.

Gutmacher Institute reports that 13 states have “triggering” laws that immediately restrict access to abortion based on the stage of pregnancy, ban it except to save the mother’s life, or return to the laws in the books before deer or the case of abortion rights since 1992 Planned parenting v. Casey it was decided. Friend “nine states [have] in front of-deer prohibit still on the books and 11 countries [have] bans on early gestational age blocked by court decisions. In countries with multiple bans, government officials will determine which ban to impose if deer has been canceled. “

What will the new reality look like in the next few weeks? Alabama has a 2019 law on books that, like Jacob Sulum has reported, “Prohibits abortion at any stage of pregnancy with a few narrow exceptions”, such as when the mother’s health is seriously endangered. A federal ban has prevented the legislation from coming into force, but it is now likely to become land law in Dixie’s heart. With the end of deerprotect. Idaho, Tennessee and Texas have almost total bans for selective abortions, which will take effect in 30 days.

How far will the freedom of states to ban abortions lead? Almost certainly to increasingly draconian restrictions on abortion, and ultimately to long-settled issues of contraception, sexual integrity, and the rights of gays and lesbians to sleep together and marry. In fact, in accordance with the opinion of the majority in Dobbs vs. Jackson Women’s Health OrganizationAssociate Judge Clarence Thomas said that “we need to review all the precedents of this court on the merits, including Griswold,, Lawrence, and Obergefel, ” three cases concerning the right to contraception, same-sex relationships and gay marriage, respectively. This is a positive sign that associate judge Brett Cavanaugh said that governments can prevent women from leaving their home states to have abortions elsewhere, an idea that was proposed by proponents of life on the eve of today’s decision.

The new balance is hardly stable. The Mississippi Act under consideration in Dobbs prohibited abortions after 15 weeks, a point to which more than 90 percent of abortions are performed anyway. While the lawsuit was pending, Texas passed a six-week abortion ban that managed to evade a federal order by giving private citizens, not civil servants right of action for its execution. Such a decision to create informers – worthy of the former East Germany to empower residents to spy on each other – was quickly adopted by states such as Oklahoma and Idaho.

We can certainly expect a steady reduction in the timing of when abortion is allowed at all and an expansion of who can warn the authorities when “conception” and therefore life has taken place. Does anyone feel comfortable with the idea that politicians like Rick Scott will be empowered to defend the “life” that “begins at conception”? As governor of Florida, he pushed through unconstitutional plans to test for drugs all civil servants, job candidates and applicants for social benefits. This is not a man who takes government restrictions seriously.

Against Scott, the idea that “life begins with conception” is hardly “a conclusion based on faith and values, but also on science” (as he argues in his Wall Street Journal piece). The two main arguments of associate judge Samuel Alito’s decision Dobbs are deeply mistaken, such as Damon Ruth Show. The idea that abortion is not mentioned in the Constitution and therefore cannot be protected by it is a parody of the concept of innumerable human rights. Importantly, Alito ignores the historical reality that, Ruth writes,

the states followed the common law at the time of its founding, the American people initially understood that legislators had no legal authority to prohibit women from terminating unwanted pregnancies in its early stages. Thus, the freedom to terminate an unwanted pregnancy before acceleration falls into the original sense and understanding of a right “retained by humans.”

In fact, even the Catholic Church, which has long been America’s most anti-abortion religious group, has not officially I condemn abortion until the mid-19th century. It is rare for people on different sides of the abortion debate to admit that the other side makes sense, but such honesty would be welcome, especially now. The argument that life begins at conception is at odds not only with history, but also with how we all feel when it comes to miscarriages, which become more emotionally profound the farther the pregnancy is. Similarly, abortions after 20 weeks look different from those at 13 weeks or less (one reason, certainly, why 93 percent of abortions are performed up to 14 weeks and only 1% after 21 weeks). At some point during pregnancy, the fetus becomes a person with the right to life and freedom, but drawing this line will always be a compromise and inaccurate.

The main framework introduced by deer half a century ago (and later amended in Casey), reflects these earlier beliefs by balancing the rights of women and the fetus, giving the state an interest in pregnancy after the first few months. For all disputes that deer somehow politicizing abortion rights, the decision actually ushered in an era of remarkably consistent abortion beliefs. As I wrote when Alito’s draft first expired in May,

attitude towards abortionFrom deer it was decided, s only 19 percent of Americans agreeing that it should be banned in all circumstances, two percentage points lower than in 1975, when Gallup began to ask the question. Eighty percent agree that it should be legal in all or some circumstances, which is four percentage points higher than in 1975. This sequence is even more remarkable when you realize that when deer it was decided 30 states completely banned abortion and only 20 allowed it under certain circumstances.

Now, in a post-deer America, every consensus is over. States that ban abortion will be completely unbound by anything but the most extreme arguments coming from the life-saving forces, who believe that life begins with conception, which makes it very likely that some state governments will eventually pave the way for each bedroom along with each examination room.

The message Get ready for the next Roe sex police! appeared first on Reason.com.

Related Posts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.